Comment of the week

TAKING a leaf out of Kerry McCarthy’s book, I’ve decided to initiate a Comment of the Week Award, to go to whoever leaves the most thoughtful, intelligent, bizarre, weird or wittiest comment over the previous week. There is no actual prize, of course – just the prestige and pride which will inevitably accompany such an honour.

And remember, the choice of Comment of the Week does not necesarily reflect or represent the views of the And another thing… Corporation, its shareholders or employees. 

And the inaugural award goes to one of my most regular contributers, Wrinkled Weasel, for this comment on yesterday’s post, Our Christian heritage still matters.

That’s funny, I thought I was visiting Cranmer for a minute, there.

You ask “why do our local authorities find it impossible to recognise and acknowledge other people’s traditions without feeling the need to devalue our indigenous faith?”

It’s a profound question. I am trying desperately here not to be party political, so here goes.

Local Government employees have it drummed into them that “equality” is paramount. It is an incessant background tape loop that informs everything they do. They are informed, in no uncertain terms, that “minorities” get a bad deal and that they must be given special consideration in all decisions. It leads to the rather crazy stories you get, such as the recent one in Bristol (a PC hotspot) where Stonewall was consulted when an attempt was made to clear foliage on Clifton Downs in case gay cruisers’ rights were infringed. (No one actually thought to contact local residents, whose homes look out on the Downs and who have to view a variety of perverted activities including those of doggers, whose pressure group got left out) It leads to a whole raft of local initiatives that can broadly be described as Political Correctness gone Mad. Strangely, I believe they are only doing their duty. There is enormous pressure on employees to be politically correct – inadvertently calling someone “love” or “duck” or “hinny” or “moi luvvrrr” or any of the local terms of endearment can have you before a disciplinary panel. Scary eh?

The background to this is a pluralistic, relativistic society with a tendency to favour aetheism. Hitherto real minorities have been foregrounded. Religious festivals emanating from outwith the UK have been given special prominence, in a genuine attempt to aid integration, but in doing so some ground has been lost by the predominant, ruling ethos, which was Christian.

Couple this with the spiritual reaction to Christians. As a genuine Christian you understand how people do not wish to be confronted with Sin – or to be more specific, their separation from God. Given the chance, they will find every excuse to run away from what we understand to be the Truth.

This mix of PC coupled with genuine social concerns, alongside man’s innate hatred of God is toxic. It is accompanied by a relativistic and at times nihilistic world view. It is also prey the the natural desire to be at the top of the tree – as soon as a minority senses it has a voice and a foothold, it will push for more and more.

Our philosophical abode, our legacy of popular thinking, has created a pyramid of hegemony with small groups angling for a higher perch. It has spawned an ethos that declares an end to scapegoating, but in reality it has merely created another scapegoat.

All of this comes into play in the working out of local government policy, as applied by its workers.

At the moment, we have an interesting dichotomy. The perceived demands of one group (e.e.Muslims) are in conflict with those of another (e.g.Gays). This is just one example of how this philosophical hook upon which local govts. hang their policies will ultimately break down. They cannot serve the demands of both communities when those communties have diametrically opposed agendas.

Christianity has so far been an easy target. We tend to be a bit laid back about it all. Yes there are a lot of loonies, but on the whole we are cool about attacks on our beliefs. What will be interesting to watch is to see society fragment even more, when the very minorities that have been championed start fighting like ferrets in a sack. This is one Pandora’s box that will lead to a very serious rethink of local government policy, if not national policy. At least, I hope so.

Advertisements

11 Comments

Filed under Blogging, Church, Society

11 responses to “Comment of the week

  1. I thought Martin’s comment, although harshly phrased, hit the mark rather more effectively.

    And it had the admirable virtue of brevity…

  2. Jay

    I found Weasel’s comment thought-provoking and, at the risk of discouraging brevity, (which I don’t see as a virtue when it amounts to asserting without justification!) I’d have liked him to explain what he meant by ‘man’s innate hatred of God’ and a’relativistic and…nihilistic world view’.

  3. Blackacre

    Great idea to fill those gaping holes of empty blog with someone else’s comments!!! I look forward to when Johnny Norfolk gets the prize.

  4. John

    Does your week end on Friday morning then Tom? 🙂

  5. It does, John – at precisely the same time the next week starts…

  6. wrinkled weasel

    Crikey! I feel deeply honoured. Thank you Tom.

    Jay. “man’s innate hatred of God”. Perhaps a little strong, but try the first Chapter of Paul’s epistle to the Romans, particularly from vs 18 onwards. It is where the phrase “Heart of Darkness” comes from. Certainly, anyone who is a Christian has experienced blind, unmitigated hatred for being one at some time in their lives.

    The other terms are fairly easy to look up, and I mean them in the generally accepted definitions of relativism and nihilism. As applied here it means a derogation of common sense in the name of equality, coupled with the rather depressing and prevalent personal view of people, including LGEmployees that declares everything is meaningless anyway.

  7. Johnny Norfolk

    Tom. so you are now picking winners and losers. this is not Labour doctrine where there are no losers only winners.
    So you now believe the strongest should win and the weak loose.
    I think that deep down you are in the wrong party.

    You are right of course and I think you will always have winners and looser. The sooner in life you know what you are good and bad at the better.

    I know I am good with people, at motivation and bringing on people to help them achieve far more.

    I know I am weak at spelling and grammer, presentations and the like.

    However I have made the best of things. I left home without a penny. i have never been given any money to speak off. i knew my strengths and weaknesses ?
    I have a fantastic wife who has totaly supported me in everything I have done. 2 children who are in good healthand self sufficent ?

    So with all this I have got over not winning and I am very blessed.

  8. Wrinkled Weasel – worthy winner with wonderful words; what wisdom!

    (Is there a prize for alliteration?)

  9. Jay

    Heavens, Weasel, I didn’t realise that LA employees were walking examples of philosophy theory. Maybe a course of uppers with their next pay cheques or some Aristotelian ethics as part of their induction training…?!

  10. Not being the sort of person who says “I told you so” (ahem) but over on Cranmer
    http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2008/12/help-oppressed-sikhs.html
    there is a post about Sikhs having Halal Christmas dinners foisted upon them, at a North London Primary School.

    According to Mrs Jorawar Singh of Sikh Awareness:

    “Sikhs are forbidden to eat halal on religious grounds but many non-Sikhs do not wish their children to consume halal meat.”

    I feel genuinely sorry for their predicament, but I am afraid it was only a matter of time that this example of the absurdity of local government relativism caused friction among the very minorities it purported to champion.

    I keep chickens. There is a pecking order. It is not fair and it favours the strong. The weakest go the bottom of it. Did local authorities seriously think they could buck the facts of life?

  11. Exactly WW – time and again we see that there is no equality, only a hierarchy of ideologies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s